Iran’s Power Transition: Will Ali Larijani Steering the Aftermath?
Strategic Stability Amidst the US-Israel-Iran Conflict and Khamenei’s Succession
In the chaotic wake of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's death during the intensified US-Israel-Iran war, the Islamic Republic is facing its most critical existential threat since 1979. As the primary architect of the current interim leadership council, Ali Larijani has rapidly emerged as the "de facto" manager of the regime’s survival.
For global observers and markets, the central question is whether Larijani’s pragmatic conservatism can prevent a total state collapse or if the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) will pivot toward a full military junta.
This transition is not merely about a change in title; it is a high-stakes gamble for Middle East stability and the future of global energy security.
The Rise of a Crisis Manager: Larijani’s Transition Strategy
Following the confirmed killing of the Supreme Leader on February 28, 2026, Ali Larijani, as the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), has taken a leading role in activating the constitutional transition. He recently announced the formation of a temporary leadership council comprising President Masoud Pezeshkian, Chief Justice Ejei, and a representative from the Guardian Council.
Larijani’s return to the core of power—after years of being sidelined—signals a desperate move by the establishment to utilize his diplomatic experience and deep ties to both the clerical elite and the military apparatus to maintain internal security.
War on Two Fronts: Managing the US-Israeli Offensive
The ongoing conflict has devastated much of Iran's traditional command-and-control infrastructure. However, Larijani is reportedly the mastermind behind the "active defense" strategy, attempting to coordinate retaliatory strikes against US bases while keeping a back channel open for potential de-escalation.
Unlike the more ideological hardliners who perished in recent strikes, Larijani has historically framed the nuclear issue and regional tensions as "resolvable" through strategic patience. Yet, with the Trump administration and Israel pushing for decisive regime change, Larijani's window for a negotiated ceasefire is closing fast as he struggles to balance defiance with the reality of military degradation.
Domestic Fragility and the Shadow of Succession
Internal pressure is the "second front" Larijani must manage. Despite his reputation as a bridge-builder, Larijani was recently sanctioned for his alleged role in suppressing anti-government protests in early 2026.
This "iron fist" approach is intended to signal to secessionist groups and domestic dissidents that the death of the Leader does not mean the end of the state. Within the Assembly of Experts, the debate over the next permanent Supreme Leader is fraught with tension.
Larijani, though not a high-ranking cleric himself, is functioning as the indispensable "CEO" of the transition, ensuring that whichever figure is eventually chosen—be it a religious conservative or a consensus candidate—the security state remains intact.
Economic Resilience and the China-Russia Axis
The economic fallout of the war has been catastrophic, with the rial in freefall and critical infrastructure under fire. Larijani’s long-term strategy relies heavily on the 25-year strategic agreement with China and security coordination with Russia. By positioning Iran as a necessary partner for Eastern powers, he aims to create a geopolitical buffer that prevents total international isolation.
For investors, Larijani represents a known quantity—a figure who prefers authoritarian stability over unpredictable radicalism. If he can secure a "managed transition" without further territorial losses, he may redefine the Islamic Republic’s power structure for the next decade.
The emergence of Ali Larijani at the helm of this crisis is a double-edged sword for the West.
On one hand, he is a rational actor capable of understanding the limits of Iranian power; on the other, his survival depends on the preservation of a system that remains fundamentally hostile to US interests. The current war has stripped away the regime's ideological veneer, leaving behind a cold, security-focused bureaucracy led by a man who knows how to survive.
Whether Larijani is the last guardian of the old order or the architect of a new, more pragmatic autocracy will depend on how many more "precise strikes" the leadership can endure before the system fractures beyond repair.